May 15, 2026
City Council Special Presentation May 2, 2026
Council meeting covered budget and finance, public safety, land use and development, with action or motion language detected in the transcript. Frequent terms included: city, pilot, then, they're, town.
AI-generated summary for convenience only. Not official municipal minutes. Verify against the source video.
Topics with timestamps
Budget and finance
21:20them $10 million. Right. For the budget. So if we have this agreement with a pilot and this developer is going to pay other money that's going to come in to the town the school still getting their $10 million for the budget. So you know, so so they're not getting cheated in any way by this extra money coming into...
Public safety
56:13know, 6% pilot versus 15% pilot." And And on those annual audits, does this get reviewed from from from this base? Does the whole program get um reviewed from this base since it's set up from this base? This This is all the projection Uh to establish the project. Yeah, once you have the agreement set, whatever's in...
Land use and development
10:43property. Uh, which is nice that they were able to keep the old Uh, this is one of the train stations that was uh, refurbished this year with the Summit train station. Uh, they did a lot of stuff with parking decks uh, they did uh, incentivize commuters uh, to use the train light rail and mass transit. Uh, this is...
Infrastructure and public works
47:05system. So they're pet paying the Sate Valley Sewerage Authority for rainwater going get processed through, which I think is totally nuts. You know, to pay for rainwater going through there because they never bifurcated and had a separate sewer and stormwater. >> [clears throat] >> And it's and I don't know I don't...
Parks, events, and community programs
10:43property. Uh, which is nice that they were able to keep the old Uh, this is one of the train stations that was uh, refurbished this year with the Summit train station. Uh, they did a lot of stuff with parking decks uh, they did uh, incentivize commuters uh, to use the train light rail and mass transit. Uh, this is...
Administration and appointments
3:10this is myself uh just for my credential and I'm a certified public accountant. I'm a public school accountant in the state of New Jersey. I'm certified in financial forensics, which is separate designation. Uh credited in business valuation. So, I value businesses. and I've worked with a lot of different...
Decisions / votes
- 3:10this is myself uh just for my credential and I'm a certified public accountant. I'm a public school accountant in the state of New Jersey. I'm certified in financial forensics, which is separate designation. Uh credited in business valuation. So, I value...
- 6:11ability to negotiate whatever they can get the developer to agree to. So, but before you get to that, I'll go through a little bit of the history. So, tax abatement started in 1961. Uh in the '50s, a lot of manufacturing left the city of Newark, primarily...
Public comment
2-year appointment, and I've been on there for 25 years. So, I as a as a holdover, basically. So, I as a board member there, I have the most experience on that board. Some other members have transitioned in and out of the board, but I've remained on that...
wound up with three times the amount of units they originally would have had in total. Total units. So, basically it's it's it's the whole pilot system is to encourage redevelopment and revitalization in the municipality. Uh and it's important that the...
I'm the mayor here. This is my town. You don't live here. You know, so I'm helping my town. So, that's how we negotiated. We had a very fair deal. And uh they're in the process of building it now. So, Yes, sir. What percentage went towards the uh tax...
run through those numbers. So one of my other partners works with me in this arena. He's he's spends a lot of time in Woodbridge cuz Woodbridge has a lot of pilots and he'll have to redevelop it. >> [clears throat] >> And the mayor of Woodbridge, John...
You know, the city decides that. Okay. Can I Can I ask you something real quick? Carla is one of us. Yeah, can can I ask you something real quick? [laughter] It's coming from establishing your municipal tax abatement policy through a municipal ordinance....
Transcript (13,148 words)
[music] >> So, I want to say good morning, everyone. Good morning. Thank you for taking the time out, you know, to come here and to get some great information, some education, um to get some information that you just didn't know, you know, um matters here in the city of Pleasant Grove. Um I want to thank, you know, Tim, Renee, and the crew, Mr. Archie. Who else is there with the crew? >> [laughter] >> You know, um just being engaged in this um in the process of the PILOT program for those who took the time out to go to the League of Municipalities to hear, you know, Mr. Keith and his presentation, and to hear and to see, you know, the benefits, you know, for the our our our city of Pleasant Grove. So, Keith, how do you say your last name? Balla. Balla. So, Keith Balla, um I want to thank you. I appreciate you, you know, for coming here to our city so we could get a a clear understanding of what PILOT means for the city of Pleasant Grove. Good morning, everyone. I'm Chief Balla. Good morning. First, I want to apologize. I know I would have brought donuts and coffee. >> [laughter] >> The sign says no food or drink. >> [laughter] >> But welcome everybody. I'm glad you could come out to learn a a bit about PILOT agreements. So, to start out, I'm a partner in an accounting firm and consultant firm called PKF O'Connor Davies. Uh Scott, we're partners. Uh he does the audit work. The area that I practice in is the forensic litigation and valuation group. So, I do investigative accounting, forensic fraud investigations in the government sector, as well as in private industry. So, I've been doing that work since 1988. I had my first investigative municipal investigation in the city of Newark. And that kept going on and on and on over the years. I always have projects, you know, to look at different things. So, the forensic part, we dig deep into the into the numbers of what actually goes on with an activity. So, it could be a pilot agreement where we've actually investigated pilot agreements in the city of Jersey City. We've done that in the city of Newark, as well. Uh with various agreements. So, this today is to really give you some education about what the pilot agreements are and what they can do. Okay. So, I put this little PowerPoint together. Uh this is myself uh just for my credential and I'm a certified public accountant. I'm a public school accountant in the state of New Jersey. I'm certified in financial forensics, which is separate designation. Uh credited in business valuation. So, I value businesses. Uh and I've worked with a lot of different businesses through my through my career. So, I've worked with construction companies, developers, uh doctors, any almost any kind of business, uh military contractors. Uh I've managed the accounting practice. That's what a management accountant does. I'm a member of the State Board of Accountancy. So, I'm the past president. I just stepped down as president of the Board of of on uh April 1st. We have a new president. I'm still a member of that board. Anything I say today has nothing to do with the Board of Accountancy. Uh that's the regulatory board that licenses certified public accountants in the state of New Jersey. So, that board, I was appointed years ago by Governor McGreevey. Uh and you're supposed to be on there for a 2-year appointment, and I've been on there for 25 years. So, I as a as a holdover, basically. So, I as a board member there, I have the most experience on that board. Some other members have transitioned in and out of the board, but I've remained on that board uh through various governors. Uh so, I'm there at the pleasure of the governor. The governor can kick me off anytime, or put me back on. So, just as an aside, Chris Christie, when he was governor, did kick me off. Uh but then I did a lot of the work, so then somebody on the board asked if we could put me back on. So. But uh I've testified in court as an expert on uh accounting matters, damages, and the former mayor of the Borough of Watchung, New Jersey, up in Somerset County. So, I served for 4 years as the mayor, uh dealt with all the challenges you deal with, you know, from the administrative end there, but I was able to apply what I do in my profession as the mayor, because we wound up having our big pilot agreement in Watchung while I was mayor. So, I negotiated that agreement with the developer. And I've appeared on TV a couple times on Dateline NBC. I investigated a televangelist for Dateline NBC, uh News 12, and JAYN, and CN. So, the first part of a tax tax uh the the pilot agreement, it's a payment in lieu of tax. So, it's an agreement between a municipality and and a developer. Uh that's what that is. It's a making of payments instead of paying the ad valorem tax on the assessed value of the property like every other property, you know, the tax assessor assesses your home or your business property, says this is what it's worth, and you pay the appropriate tax rate based on how the budget kicks out, and they pass that down. Well, on your pilot, they're not They're not going to pay that ad valorem tax. They're going to pay under an agreement. The agreement's a negotiated agreement. So, the municipality has the ability to negotiate whatever they can get the developer to agree to. So, but before you get to that, I'll go through a little bit of the history. So, tax abatement started in 1961. Uh in the '50s, a lot of manufacturing left the city of Newark, primarily Newark and Camden. Uh and areas became blighted. So, they passed the Fox Lance Act, which was to incentivize developers. The developers in that Fox Lance have an advantage, and it's a decisive advantage to most municipalities. So, then in 1991, they developed the long-term tax exemption act, which came in after that, various amendments, and it was to create equity between the municipality and the developer through that act. So, the developer enters into an agreement, uh and they'll pay a per- Typ- Typically, they pay a percentage of their gross revenue is what the what the agreement is. Uh but it's really to to incentivize the developer. If you can't make money in a particular area, let me give you a good example. If you have all affordable housing, the the owner of the property is going to get less rent than they would at market rate. So, they can't make this payment profitable. So, to incentivize them, you give them a pilot agreement. So, it makes it uh easier in terms of managing the dollars uh since they can't get the market rate rent, they'll pay less than on on the uh property tax. So, they're going to pay under their pilot agreement, a percentage of their gross revenue to temporarily. But, it's really to uh help the community what whatever the community's needs are. So, it's in accordance with the town's master plan. You want to have it in conjunction with the master plan to achieve the objectives you want to achieve. Uh but, it it's the outgrowth of where you had substandard, unsafe, unsanitary, dilapidated uh properties and not conducive for living or working. So, that's basically what an area in need of redevelopment is that one category number eight. You know, substandard, unsafe, unsanitary, dilapidated, not conducive to live or work. So, that's area in need of redevelopment. I can give you a quick example of what I didn't think was an area in my own town. So, prior to being mayor, they designated 44 acres of bucolic woodlands as an area in need of redevelopment. So, it was nice to have a park there or something, but they said, "No, no, it's an area in need of redevelopment. And so, we're going to incentivize a developer to build." Well, any developer would have built on the 44 acres. It's a nice area to build. So, I didn't think it met that definition, but once the planning board designates it and says that, it goes to municipality, they designate it, it's pretty much done whether it was or wasn't in your opinion, you know, uh qualified or not. So, this is a picture of Jersey City. Uh factory between towers is still there, but it was along the waterfront. It was a pretty blighted area. Uh and an area that was definitely needed redevelopment. This also is along the waterfront. When I looked at this picture the first time, it looked like it was like somewhere in China or something. You know, with this with this uh thing on the wharf, but you can see the twin towers in the background. Uh this property here was in Newark. It was a varnish factory uh where they made varnish. Uh this was called It's the Ironbound section of Newark. Uh, right along the rail line and the PATH train. Uh, this is the Jersey City skyline today. So, through use of pilot agreements to incentivize developers, and one developer in particular was Lefrak organization that did a lot of development in Jersey City. Uh, the train is full of that whole waterfront. And it took time, but over over time, you know, one got developed, two, three, four, and eventually the whole waterfront is completely, you know, redeveloped along the Jersey City and created its own skyline. With various businesses, residences. Uh, same here with the the brownstones of Jersey City. An area along the park uh, get the revitalized. This is that factory in Newark now. It's a luxury condos uh, in that old warehouse factory. Uh, it's a it's a beautiful building. It took them a while to to clean it up, but uh, they really transformed that whole building into a beautiful historical property. Uh, which is nice that they were able to keep the old Uh, this is one of the train stations that was uh, refurbished this year with the Summit train station. Uh, they did a lot of stuff with parking decks uh, they did uh, incentivize commuters uh, to use the train light rail and mass transit. Uh, this is I believe the Madison train station. It looks like an old church, but it's a train station. So, I'm going through the process. Uh, governing body adopts a resolution for an area in need of redevelopment. They send that off to your planning board. Okay, so the planning board then does a study or has a study done or conducts a study to see is it an area in need in need of redevelopment. Once that study is done and they send it back then to the municipal council to vote on it in that process. So then it goes to the council process and eventually becomes an ordinance which is the last step. Everybody adopts the ordinance for redevelopment plan to redevelop a particular area. So but it's done in conjunction with the planning board so there's usually a lot of community input. So you have public hearings, the general public can give their input as to what they like to see in a particular area. Do they want apartments? Do they want a combination mixed use with retail and apartments? Do they want a specialized industry? As an example in the in the town of Kenilworth, New Jersey they they have one of these AI companies coming in right now with a $1.8 billion investment in their in their town little town for an AI center with an old power source, too. So it's not going to take away from the power of the community because they need to take a tremendous amount of power to use these AI centers. Tremendous amount of electricity. But uh so they're basically rehabilitating it's an old Schering-Plough pharmaceutical site. So I grew up in that area as a kid. It was called White's Laboratories and they had you know pharmaceutical laboratories and Schering-Plough bought it and then one of the other pharmaceuticals bought out Schering-Plough and now it's going to be completely changed to a a tech I you know a a tech center for AI data center. So and so the town it's like transformational for for a small community probably a big difference. And that was the biggest taxpayer. So once the pharmaceutical shut down they were nervous like what's going to happen is everybody's housing tax going to go up down because we don't have the big commercial you know occupant entity occupying property. So you know that that's what their fear was and they were fortunate to get somebody to come in there. You want to say something? >> What kind of problems do you have with that community? I'm not I haven't researched what they're going to do, but I'm I'm an advocate of these small nuclear plants. >> Right. The small nuclear plants are very efficient. And they're they're very different than the old ones that they did in the 1960s. Right. Those big plants. So, there's space Are they are they used in this country yet? Uh I think our governor is is promoting to to move that forward for New Jersey. Salem and signed the bill for the one in Salem. Oh, really? Yeah. Yeah. Salem can join it? He was just in Salem and signed the bill for the Salem district using one of the small nuclear plants to produce electricity. Oh, yeah. So, the questions come up areas that need to be developed or are they not going to be developed? So, uh one of the instances is the state supreme court uh their decisions to create uh a fair share affordable housing uh which is statewide. So, basically every community has to have affordable housing to some extent. Right. Uh a lot of municipalities put it into their ordinance that they have a requirement of 15% or 20% of any new housing has to be affordable. Uh if they don't have the affordable, then they're going to if they don't meet their affordable housing obligation under this then it opens them up to what they call builder's remedy lawsuits. So, if the town doesn't comply with the affordable housing, then the builder may not have to abide by the density of the local ordinance and may be able to double it, triple it, or quadruple it. And that's happened in a few communities in New Jersey. Where they fought against it, the builder's remedy came in and then they wound up with three times the amount of units they originally would have had in total. Total units. Uh So, basically it's it's it's the whole pilot system is to encourage redevelopment and revitalization in the municipality. Uh and it's important that the residents are are active and vocal in speaking about what they want in their community. Uh cuz the elected officials I was elected official for years as mayor. You know, I went out to the community and talked to people like, "What do you want?" It's not about I don't know. But what do you want? It's It's our town together. You know, so we want to do the best for the for the community. So, you need all that input. Uh and the and they Uh the residents can really control the direction of affordable housing and all of the pilot agreement redevelopment that goes on. Uh when this occurs, there's a financial agreement that's put in place. And that's all negotiated. So, I'm fortunate that I've worked for developers and I've worked for towns in helping them in negotiations. So, when I was mayor of my own town, I negotiated with the developer. So, I'll give you a quick example. The developer comes in and they do a budget of here's the cost of construction, here's how much we're going to have to borrow. He and when we're done, it's going to cost us X dollars. Say 10 million. And then here's the rent we're going to get. They have a projection on rent. And they project the rent. They said, "Well, based on the rent and our expenses, we have this debt cuz we have loans. You know, we can only pay a nickel for property taxes." Basically. So, when they came to me as the mayor, they said, "Well, you know, we think we only pay 8%." 8%? I said, "I think your numbers are all wrong." "What do you mean?" I said, "Let's go into your numbers." So, that's the key part of the whole negotiation part is to dig into the details and get the real numbers. So, what I found out with the developer in my town that I was negotiating with cuz I told myself, "Look, I want 15%." He goes, "15% there's no way you can make any money." You know, we might make eight. I said, "No, I want 15% of gross revenue." And what these are all legal terms. So, you have to define what's gross revenue. Right? Cuz developers they're smart people and they got smart advisors advising them. So, I said, "Gross revenue is every dollar that comes into your business. So, whether you sell stuff through laundry or have community events, you can have weddings in the in the community building, any any dollars that come in is gross revenue. It's not just gross revenue. It's all the dollars that come in. So, it's it's it's really tricky. Uh so, you need you need uh somebody really to help you, I think, yeah, to to advise you uh when you're negotiating that. So, I was negotiating with them and I said, "Look, uh I think your construction costs are too high cuz I represent construction contractors. And I said, "Prices you have on stuff here, I think it's too high. So, you're inflating your construction costs." He was like, "Well, you know, it's a cushion." It's well, you're inflating your construction costs. So, by when you inflate your construction costs, now you're inflating your debt cuz you have to borrow more money. So, when you inflate your debt, you're lowering then the income cuz you have more interest. So, I said, "So, you over inflate the construction, you over inflate the debt and that's why you're lowering your profit. So, I'm going to adjust those numbers on your projections." So, the developer gives me his projections and I adjust those to what I think the correct numbers are. I said, "You're using a higher interest rate than a real interest rate you're going to pay." So, that too, you're inflating the interest. So, then I went to the rent. I said, "Okay. So, we did went through the construction piece." I said, "Now, let's look at the rent." So, I said, "Where'd you get your rent?" He said, "Well, Rutgers did a study. Rutgers does these studies." I said, "Rutgers?" I said, "Oh, it's nice you used the Rutgers study." I said, "I but I don't believe it. I believe in what is the real rent in my community? So, they I said I went they went to a a a development project that was 25 years old on a major state highway. I don't know why everyone wants to live on a state highway. You know, I'd rather live in in a in a quiet street than busy thoroughfare. So, I said so their rents are lower. And it's 25 years old and it needs refurbishing, so their rents aren't as good. I said where this property is is up on the hill in the woods. A beautiful area that people are going to pay more rent than down on the highway. So, I said so you're understating the rental income. You're using a too low of a number. So, I said I'm jacking that number up. So, I jacked that number up. I lowered his construction cost. And now lo and behold, he's got substantial profit to pay my 15%. And that's how we got there. So, he wasn't happy. So, then I just tell you. So, they hired uh rest his soul, uh Senator Cody, Governor Cody. His son was one of their consultants. And he was there. He goes, "Well, I came I read your articles. You know, you wrote about these PILOT thing uh he goes, "I'm help trying to help these guys." I said, "Well, that's nice you're trying to help them, but I'm helping my town." I'm the mayor here. This is my town. You don't live here. You know, so I'm helping my town. So, that's how we negotiated. We had a very fair deal. And uh they're in the process of building it now. So, Yes, sir. What percentage went towards the uh tax relief for the residents in the town from the property what is it? Well, I want what percentage The way the PILOT works is 100% money goes to the municipality. Okay? And you have to give 5% to the county. So, that's under the statute. So, that's like fixed. Nothing has to go to the school. But you can decide where you want that extra money to go to. So, because the school just so you so you understand the way the finances work. The school puts their budget together for their operations. So if they need $10 million for the school budget, they put in $10 million. The town's going to give them $10 million. Right. For the budget. So if we have this agreement with a pilot and this developer is going to pay other money that's going to come in to the town the school still getting their $10 million for the budget. So you know, so so they're not getting cheated in any way by this extra money coming into the town. But it does come into the town. Um I I think that I'm not sure if everybody knew that there are three ways to collect money for pilot programs. One is through the phased in which we have always used and that's mostly the 30 years and they don't come to full payment of their taxes until the 30th year. The other one is like you said with the percentage of cost. I believe it's 2% of cost is what you can charge with everything included and the other one is 15% of revenue. Those are things that we need to see a side-by-side comparison [clears throat] of which is more beneficial to the city of Pleasantville. For each project. Right. For each project. Right. You need to you need to chart that out and and run through those numbers. So one of my other partners works with me in this arena. He's he's spends a lot of time in Woodbridge cuz Woodbridge has a lot of pilots and he'll have to redevelop it. >> [clears throat] >> And the mayor of Woodbridge, John McCormick, he's a former state treasurer. He's a college classmate of mine and directors. Bright guy, knows finances, but he wants somebody to go through those numbers and say what are we going to get at the end of the day? And some of the great things they've done with their pilots, I mean they built a a indoor skating arena, a hockey arena for skating for the community. Mhm. Uh which phenomenal. It is adding all these extra community activities for its residents through [clears throat] the use of pilot money. Mhm. Uh, and the schools are doing well, too. Can I ask a question? Yes. So, with that being said, within the pilot program, is that the language in the agreement towards uh for the money to go towards the lower taxes, a certain percentage, or like you just stated, uh money go towards if you want to say uh we want to add whatever within our town. Is that the language that has to be in the agreement in the pilot program, or is that afterwards once the city receives their part? >> Afterwards. >> Okay. It's that's afterwards because the pilot agreement is between the municipality and the developer. Right. As to how it's fixed what they're going to pay to the municipality. What the town does with it afterwards is up to the town to develop a plan. You know, so we're kind of out of that loop. So, let me Let me understand. So, so we So, what we're looking at out of their agreement is how much money the city's going to get out of it. Right. Plain and simple. Right. And then And then how that money is dispersed. That's based on the city. The community discusses how we're going to spend that money. Now, let me cut it real quick just for my understanding. So, the community uh did you say decides how that money is going to be spent, or is it up to the city solely determines how the money's going to be spent? Well, it's it's your elected officials who the community should be influencing in their decision. You know, the city decides that. Okay. Can I Can I ask you something real quick? Carla is one of us. Yeah, can can I ask you something real quick? [laughter] It's coming from establishing your municipal tax abatement policy through a municipal ordinance. And I'm I keep asking this question about the taxes. Listen to this question. This is a delegated balance because too little subsidies may cause a municipality to fail to realize the development objectives, but too much may unduly burden other taxpayers who must offset the subsidies through their own tax dollars. So, what I'm getting at again the tax dollars we as the taxpayers in Penn Hills we're looking for from the pilot programs a certain percentage to go towards lowering, you know, our property tax what we're paying. You know, cuz I was reading something even last night in reference to sometimes it can add up to $15 based on the project cost. And then once you do the math and break it down just for an example if it's 15 if it's a $150,000 for an example. Once that's broken down comes out to $15 that can go towards lowering your tax dollar, your tax payment is for each individual. Yeah, so let me just get one of the one of the other nuances in the negotiation of the agreement uh came up with schools. So, when I went to the developer he said, "Oh, you know, there's not going to be any impact on your schools with our development." And I said, "So, I said, so woah woah woah woah woah wait wait wait wait you're building 240 apartments." They're like, "There's no kids?" They said, "No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no >> [laughter] >> But I said, "What I'm going to do I'm going to use that other project." So, the other project had 400 apartments. So, I went back to our school system and said, "How many kids came out of the 400 apartments?" I got the right numbers. So, then I said, "Look, these are real numbers. These are the kids that came out of the 400 apartments." So, you're still 40. Here's the number. You're going to affect our school district. That's why I need more money. And so, that's why you really need the facts You We've got to You can't look at this as like that they're going to lower our taxes. They are going to be contributing to the tax base. And whatever we get extra money if there is any because they will be children going to the school district. We only contribute 11% right now towards our school district in the city of Pleasantville. Um, but there's other things involved. 11% of our tax dollars. No, a total a total of of 11 from the city. 22 is from state from federal and county. Yeah. And the state gives us 78%. No, it's not you wish it was 22 but it's not 22. Cuz we'd be in collective despair but there is an issue. There are other things involved. We reimburse for trash pickup in apartment project. Yeah. In the city of Pleasantville, the landings, all those places, we reimburse that company. When we build pilot programs like this that are going to have 180 apartments this one coming up on the plans we're going to reimburse them. Well, that's money out of our pocket that we are not getting as property taxes from this. So, that's coming out of your pocket to pick up trash in this project. >> Can I Can I just say something? If I'm not mistaken, that was something that we negotiated where they going to have their own trash pickup? >> Yeah. So, that's not going to be a problem. >> has theirs. >> No, no, no, no. I'm I'm talking about this project. This No, that was something that he said they were going to put dumpsters out and not have the service that they pick up in the apartment complex. >> had this discussion. >> these are things that need to be negotiated in a contract. But those are things that never come out. Those are small things that actually are dollars and cents to the taxpayers of Pleasantville that we need to be conscious of as [clears throat] taxpayers. It is not going to lower our taxes. You're not going to see a reduction in your taxes at all. Just jump on that point as well. So, in in my town we have volunteer fire department. And so, this this particular this particular project is going to be a four-story building. You need a ladder truck. We don't have a ladder truck. So, I said, "Look, you're going to force us to get a ladder truck. This is a big cost to our other taxpayers just because of you, for your development. We're not getting anything out of that. That's to save your residents. And then you're making the money off of over there." So, I said, "We need to factor that in, too." And we went up negotiating actually with a neighboring town to jointly come together and get the ladder truck cuz we have uh uh a joint agreement with North Plainfield, the surrounding town, and our other surrounding towns. So, let me move a little forward here. So, uh the key the key with these financial terms, uh just uh I didn't catch your name, Emma, but you did mention there's a 30-year like [clears throat] horizon here. And ideally what happens is they're paying the pilot agreement based on the gross revenue, right? A percentage that is 15%. And over time by year 25, they're going to be at or greater than your ad valorem tax, probably. You know, with the cuz if the rents keep going up, the money keeps going up that's coming in. So, at some point though, it it drops off. At 30 years, they'd be paying your ad valorem tax like everybody else based on the assessed value of the property. So, we look at some things in Jersey City. Uh we reviewed 19 out of 179 pilots. It's a lot of 179 pilots. Uh where uh property owners worked around the terms of the pilot agreement. So, the developers knew the terms within the agreement and they shifted how they do their finances to basically cheat the city, which comes in as well cuz all of these pilots required annual audit. Uh but somebody's going to look at look at them, too. So, of the 19 properties, they represented over a billion dollars in real estate value paying 39 million a year. So, 39 million is a lot. But it would have been 80 million a year under the regular tax. So, it's a big difference. And So, just speak I'll jump I'll jump on it. I got a bunch of worries. So, so Newark, uh we we had a case where the developers set up since you're supposed to get gross rent, right? A percentage of gross revenue, right? The developer was tricky, so he said, "All right, I'm going to set up a master lease with an affiliated company for a lower rent." So, he rents the entire building to an affiliate for, say, a million a year. And meanwhile, that affiliate then rents out all the all the other apartments to everybody else and taking 4 million a year instead of one. So, they're paying tax on the 1 million not the 4 million. So, they were basically cheating the city of Newark. Uh we have we uncovered that when we went through and looked at some of their pilots. So, 53% of the entities that we sampled failed with having the required annual audit reports. They didn't They didn't Developers are required to submit it every year. They didn't have it in there. This was in uh I think that was in Jersey City. Uh outside auditors could be contracted to audit the pilot compliance. So, uh your auditor is here, right? He audits your your municipality, goes through everything. The pilot compliance is like a little sliver of the total thing here. And I think you have what eight agreements? Do you know? Is it seven or eight? Seven or eight? >> My office don't know. Yeah. It's not a lot. You don't have You don't have a hundred, but you you have a few. Yeah, but they come down here. Yeah, I think So uh these are legal agreements. And so the language is really specific and you need really good definitions of what things are. Don't have to have good definitions and understood examples. The likeness the outcome of the outside is the profit making entities going to try and cheat your city. So I'm just telling you from my experience. So the definition of what the annual service charge is, how it's computed with examples, the annual audit report, which whatever schedules you want. If you want them to give you a list of every tenant uh and what the rent is, you put that in the agreement. And then they have to provide it. Uh definitions of what net profit is. So I have I have a case where people think net profit is something totally different than what I thought it was. You got to define what it is and how it's computed net profit. Cuz not everybody has the same definition. So in a high-rise building and part of the agreements was definition concerned on how you going to receive the money towards the municipality. If the high-rise development has apartments, but the lower level is storefronts. Are they supposed to get that money for the storefronts as an extra or just on the rent? The whole thing? All of it? So you you can you can actually negotiate the agreement. Mhm. That's the retail. That's it. You get a percentage of what the retail store is If he goes Negotiate that. If he go back and you find out and say a gentleman like the self comes in and do a audit and find out things was done kind of scrupulous, right? Just follow me with this. And you find out things were done wrong. Can the municipality recoup anything from what was done? Yes, absolutely. >> Okay. Absolutely. So that happened to Jersey City. So, Jersey City uh they went back to Lefrak. Said, "Hey, you know, we went through your agreements and we think you underpaid." And they fought a little bit here and there and then Lefrak came back and said, "Okay." And they gave a boatload of money. It's a lot. A real lot they paid to settle the dispute. So, but you definitely can get it back. Okay. So, definitely like I said mentioned earlier, definition of project costs, the duration of the agreement also over 30 years. And I recommend that you look for a minimum threshold percentage of your real estate taxes. So, you don't want to get any less than a certain amount. So, you have like a threshold they no matter what. I don't care if you made money or not developer. We need a minimum threshold of X dollars. Doesn't matter what your rent was. And under these agreements the land they still pay the tax on the land. So, they're still paying the ad valorem tax on the land. It's the improvements that are is under the >> [clears throat] >> And that's tricky, too. So, like on ours we we may then kick in as if it was a higher assessment on the land cuz it's farmland assessed at 44 acres. So, they're paying like nothing. So, we made them have to pay more. They know you know, to to go back. Yes, it's farmland assessed but they're paying like nothing. $1,000 on the first 5 acres. So, they paid the uh annual service charge and the land tax and they paid quarterly. Uh there's audit reports and it would have consequences if they breach not giving you the audit report. You could have accelerated amounts of money. But these are all negotiable things that you want to make sure you put in place to protect the municipality. Cuz you're weren't them a break. I mean, they they are taking a risk [snorts] as a developer. Believe me, there's a big risk as a developer. They do have a big risk. But you know, you're taking a risk, too. Right. So, and then limitations on their profits and reserves. So, if it's based on on something with their profits, a lot of times they'll put in these reserves. And the insurance companies are great for this and all that. States complain to me about the insurance companies because they put all these reserves and they don't pay anything. That's right. Build in more reserves and then they're all, "Oh, we're sorry. We don't have money." You can adjust the reserves. And then by adjusting the capital capital to reserve fund requirement as they see it. And the reserve fund requirement, is that how they would do that? By adjusting the reserve fund requirement? >> necessarily that, but any kind of reserves is is a way to it it should be based on some kind of calculation that's like sets the reserve. Not just arbitrary cuz they don't want to want to pay. Uh issues raised in compliance reviews. Uh management agreements where uh they overpay expenses. We've had that, too, where they said, "Oh, we didn't make no profit." Yeah, they have a management agreement and they're paying all the expenses over to a related company. You know, it's not not realistic. You know, the CFO is getting all this extra money and all of his his relatives. Uh commingling multiple projects. We've seen that, too, where they bury expenses from the other project and they say, "Oh, sorry. We're not making any money. We can't pay you." Uh So, the municipality negotiates these terms and uh like I said, you really need to go through every little piece of this. And there's extra things you can kick in. You really can customize it to your specific needs and what what you want in the community. Uh annual inspections of units and and and fees. That's another one. Uh in the financial projections, so the developer puts together financial projections. Uh we do those. We've done those for developers and we've done them for municipality, both. And and in my case when I was the mayor then I critiqued it. You know, went through each of the each of the items. So, there is estimated project costs. You have your land and land improvements. So, that's pretty clear what what they're going to pay for the land. You have a contract for that. Uh if it's hasn't been purchased yet. Uh architects and engineer professional fees you always have. Construction costs. There's a lot of latitude in construction costs. And uh today versus 10 years ago, material costs were significantly higher. Way higher than they were 10 years ago, so. Then you have insurance, interest. You know, the developer may may get a really good interest rate because he has a lot of other projects with his financing with his bank. Uh where where somebody first guy project he's doing will pay a higher rate. Uh so, their financing costs, what they get in permanent financing. Well, so the developer during construction has construction loans. They're paying it, you know, interest only. And then once once the project's complete then they turn that into permanent financing. So, they get a mortgage like you do on your house. So, they get a long term of some type. The long long term amortization on it. All right. They have marketing costs. They pay for real estate taxes during the process. And during the process they pay the ad valorem tax. Uh so, in my case when it was Parkland the city said, "No, no, during the process of construction you're paying full boy ad valorem taxes on what that land could be worth." Uh in developer's overhead. That's another one where they can wiggle. Wiggle with developer overhead. Uh project uh construction costs. Uh challenging the amounts they're using. Look at the industry standards. You know, what's standard in the industry and are they deviating from the standards of that industry? They typically overstate the construction costs, which overstates, like I said, the the financing costs. Uh and if if I'm the developer, I want to pay the least taxes possible and make the most profit from this project. That's just a fact. profit Uh so, they like to overstate their costs and understate what their projected income is. And uh like the last one here, understate projected number of children to attend school. That one you really need to get do your homework. Do your homework and know how many kids are going to really you think come out of this project. Don't let them rely on their record study. Cuz that's all they ever do. So, we work with other We're we're a CPA consulting firm. We work with other uh business professionals that all they do is like the calculations for these kinds of things and they get to do the financing. Uh and they they won't trust the record study. So, in my town, we hired a financial consultant. And I disagreed with them. I disagreed. You go, "No, it's it's typically you get typically 10%." I said, "I want 15." Really, you typically get 10, I want 15. Cuz they can pay 15 on units. You know, so I'm not I'm not going to rely on the record study. I'm going to go get the actual what it's going to show up that we're going to have to take care of in our school system. Cuz that's the driving cost. You have to build a new school. With eight teachers? Where can it all fit in with the existing school system? Okay, you're going to have here a performa comparison of expected rental income. Look at vacancies, you know. They like to tend to overstate what their vacancy rate is going to be. I've never seen an apartment complex with 100% vacancy. I've seen retail space 100%. Retail space, but never People want to be in a place all day. So, the are never 100% Uh but they'll they'll they'll overstate the vacancy rate. Uh they'll overstate their expenses just to show lower profits and same with like I said interest and the debt. So, you need to challenge those projections, negotiate that. Uh research and find uh what can increase the rental income or what can increase the revenue to increase the driver That's the driver for your pilot payment that you want to get. They'll they'll understate uh the affordable units rental income as well. They I said they use the Rutgers study, the school children impacts on your schools, all right? So, challenging the impact. It's worth challenging the impact. You know, it's big and and getting the right numbers. Uh in our case, maybe at the end of the day we wouldn't have to I know we didn't have to build the next But maybe you have to get teacher or buildings, some visual aids. It depends on the on the project we're talking about, how big the project is. And a lot of lot of I don't know about uh Pleasant Hill, but there were a lot of towns that sold off their schools when the population dropped. It was like a popu- population dropped. They're rebuilding the old building. >> a new one. We're building a new one. Yeah. That is the key. Yeah. School development, sorry. It's building a new one, not the city portion. Right. Okay. Uh financial impacts negotiations This will be This is in in the in the stuff you can take to the voters. Mhm. Um In in any part of the um financial aspects of this and any agreement, does the developers start Do they pay a school rate from the beginning or is that not part of the or is that something that has to be negotiated? The sewer they have to negotiate for hookup. So, I'll give you my example in Watchung. So, the closest sewer hookup was our neighboring town called Berkeley Heights. That's the closest. Berkeley Heights said, "You're not tying into us. Too bad. We're not We're not We have no interest in letting you tie in cuz we have our own developments going on." So, they were shut out of Berkeley Heights cuz it was the closest gravity feed sewer. So, then they said, "All right. Well, we'll go to Plainfield." That's the next one. Well, Plainfield, it's interesting. They had to go down the mountain. It was up on a hill. They go down the mountain. Then they had to build a pump station to run back up the hill to then come back down the hill again to tie into where Plainfield was. So, and that went through a a big developer's property where he controlled the sewer line. So, if the town had to get involved with negotiating with the existing retail property owner who controlled that sewer line to tie into the line to go through his property. So, it was closer to Plainfield. And then we negotiated that you, the developer, are going to be 100% responsible and I want reserves put up front for when that's sewer pump station busts because when that thing busts, you've got 230 apartments pumping all their sewage and it's not going up. You know, it's an emergency. The money's got to be there way in advance. And you got to put the money there now. Right. Well, the reason I asked is because like the ACUA has a thing where they don't have a meter, but they charge each municipality by how much waste comes into their system and that's how our sewer bills are sent out and adjusted for. So, if we have Say we have a a program coming online and they have 200 apartments. In that amount of space that those 200 apartments are, maybe you could put 30 houses, which means maybe you have 60 toilets in there as opposed to the 200, which maybe have at least 200 toilets if not more that are going to be flushed daily, which means that the the homeowners of Pleasantville, their sewer rates are going to go up because there's more incoming waste into the um ACUA. So you want to force the developer to pay for it. There you go. Apparently, thank you. Yeah, you want to force the developer to pay for that extra flow. Absolutely. First thing you you you got to make sure they have the capacity to take the flow. And that's the big thing. >> And if they have the capacity to take the flow, and if they do, you want the developer paying the extra so your residents aren't impacted by that. Right. I mean, one of the one of the things in Newark is they still have their uh storm drains, a lot of them, that go into their sewer system. So they're pet paying the Sate Valley Sewerage Authority for rainwater going get processed through, which I think is totally nuts. You know, to pay for rainwater going through there because they never bifurcated and had a separate sewer and stormwater. >> [clears throat] >> And it's and I don't know I don't know if you have if you ever did testing on your system here, too, you know, with with uh is there water seeping into your system anywhere? You know, if there's cracked pipes and there's water leaking in, you're paying for more flow going through there. You're paying for sewage through rainwater flowing through your sewer pipes. So I know cuz in my town we did that. We we hired the the engineering firm to go in and put the the lines through and they found where there's leakage coming in cuz there's a lot of streams and there's so there's stream water going into the sewers and our town's paying for that in sewerage overall, even though the residents are paying whatever they're supposed to pay, at the end of the day, they're paying more than us. For the rain water. Is rain water going in? What what in in the in the situation that the town is already aware that the sewer line is already incapable and these not up to the standards that should be. And then you either have um uh a new building right instead of the line of the sewer system itself throughout the whole city. How how how can this also be you know, put into the into the conversation in terms of you know, if we if we have a developer coming in. Bobby has the answer to that. >> All right, yeah. I I can answer that point because the work on it um we actually um we actually recognize that that is the case um especially in that location. It's new development. So, um that particular project is going to require um the the new obviously new um water systems going in over there. Have you been in 95 lately? Have you been in there lately? You see what is being done That's it. That's that's pretty much you know, the work that we're doing to make sure that they're able to um take on that additional load of sewage. Let me just also say that based on um that same information um please understand that they will have a sewer bill. Their sewer bill offsets that additional um amount that you know, it doesn't go to the to the other property owners. They they they'll pay their own sewer bill. Like they'll have a sewer bill themselves. So, it's not like they have to increase anything [clears throat] for them. It's you know, they're carrying their load of flow the amount of units that they have and their own personal suit suit for that project. So, who is paying for the process that's going on now? So, that's great that's a great question. It's a collaborative. You know, we negotiated it out with the both of us to do some of the stuff, and then we've been able to get the state to help us out with grants to do some of it. So, none of it's on the taxpayers right now. Zero. Okay, a couple other things just to to keep me mindful of traffic issues, traffic studies, road grading. Uh my project in Watchung is a there's a right on a county road that's in Somerset County, but there's an agreement with Union County that Union County controls the road. So, even though it resides in Somerset County, Union County controls. So, the developer had to go to Union County to try to get approval to put a traffic light in because you can't get out of his development without a traffic light. And so, Union County said, "Well, you know, we have nothing to do with it." And they came to Somerset County and Somerset County said, "Hey, there's no light there now." And our town has no traffic lights. So, we don't have to maintain any. No, we're not maintaining it. And so, who's going to maintain that light now? So, it's all forced on the developer, but the traffic study, I had to laugh at that too because the roadway right now it's between two state highways, Route 22 and Route 78. It goes between the two. In the morning, if you're from Route 22 up to Route 78, it's bumper to bumper. People going to work and commuting. And at night, 5:00, it's bumper to bumper coming down from 78 down to 22 the other way. So, I said, "That it's like a the worst road you could build to have more density on." And [clears throat] they said, "Well, you know, uh they got it Somebody's going to hear me say, "Well, it's it's it's not that bad, you know, that kind of thing." But, it's terrible. It's terrible. If you're If you're there every day, you see it's terrible. Uh another one, negotiating pedestrian sidewalks or bike lanes. Same Same thing. This is the opportunity, if you can negotiate the pedestrian walkways or bike lanes for safety reasons, the factor that in there, too. Same thing with landscaping. You know, we have a lot of people that wanted certain kinds of landscape, certain kinds of trees. We have the heavy tree ordinances in our town. Like, you take a tree down, you got to plant a new tree. They don't like just uh uh evergreen, they want oaks and maple and everything. Uh which is great. You know, cuz it's it's a woodsy area. That That lot of uh vegetation. Uh but the traffic lights, road widening, of lanes, turning lanes, uh those are all things you got to account for. And then lowering the speed limits. Thank you. Lowering the speed limits. >> Thank you. So, well, I tried I tried to get the county of Somerset to go 50/50 on putting a sidewalk that would go through the entire length of our town, which is about 3 miles long, I think. 3 or 4 miles long. And have a sidewalk. There's no sidewalks at all. It's a county road, no sidewalks. I said it'd be a great thing to put sidewalks the whole length. People would walk, bike on it, much safer than, you know, walking in the street or riding your bike on the edge of the road there. And the county's like, "No, no, no, we don't want to do it." So, I said, "Then lower it. How about lower the speed limit?" Cuz it's 40 40 miles an hour. And when you're walking there, it's not that safe walking at 40 mile an hour cars. Lower it to 25. They said, "Well, well." So, I did it just for the one section, close closer to the borough hall. But uh on both sides of the borough hall they did it, but they didn't do it for the whole length of the roadway. Cuz if you lower it to 25, then these people are driving slower. It's not not as That's unsafe. Uh considering environmental impacts, uh you're you got the water here. You're on the water, right? And I'm sure there's all kinds of wildlife in the water. No, no. Birds, birds, turtles, birds, and stuff. There's a lot of stuff there. Uh, so I know we we have we have to have we we have the different kinds of birds, turtles, That's all we have. and uh, I personally believe that uh, they should have developed it. They should have just made it like parkland and then the green acres. Uh, and then it's found an engineer the engineer came in and he did a study to send the DEP to get the approval to build these units. And he said, "Well, these species that you have there, it's really not conducive for them to be there." Mhm. >> he's saying it's not conducive. It's better that you have them, you know, apartments and you know, first off these animals. You know, it's right. Now it's like you have these animals that have been here for thousands of years. So, uh, big question on on flooding, storm water, that's another one to watch out for. This my particular project didn't watch out for. This is at the top of the hill. Yeah, all this lush vegetation. You take it all out and you put in 230 apartments, hardscape. Where's the water going to flow? Down the hill. Well, where is it flooding already? Down the hill. So, Route 22, that's state highway, floods almost every time it rains and now it's going to be a lot worse cuz of all the hardscape the water's flowing there. So, and so there should be a study as How How do you mitigate that? You know, where do they divert the water to? This I already touched on the Jersey City stuff. This is a typical chart that we wind up putting together. The developer put it together and we'll put it together. And it goes through the years, 30 years, from year one to year 30. Shows the uh revenues, gross revenues, their operating expenses, property tax filing, reserves, what they're going to make in cash flow from the from the property, how they service their debt, pay down their debt. Mhm. So, this is all like an accounting uh nightmare to put that together, but you know, that gets done basically, and then each of the numbers gets evaluated Does it make sense in The developer will use these to basically sell the municipality, "Yeah, look, I'm not making money. I need a little pilot, you know, 6% pilot versus 15% pilot." And And on those annual audits, does this get reviewed from from from this base? Does the whole program get um reviewed from this base since it's set up from this base? This This is all the projection Uh to establish the project. Yeah, once you have the agreement set, whatever's in the agreement that you want it based on whatever's in the agreement. Mhm. And then there're actual numbers. So, look at the actual operations of what what occurred. Now, you got your topic here, thoroughly evaluate adequacy of the sewer capacity. Mhm. How you going to handle the sewage, who's going to pay for it, emergency services, EMS, fire, Skilled labor resources. Mhm. Uh mass transit for affordable housing. I said that this [clears throat] My project's on the top of the hill, and they're not required to put a sidewalk to go to the bottom of the hill with the bus services. So, I said, "The poor people, if they're affordable and they don't own a car, they're going to walk down this roadway that's 35 mph with no sidewalk. That doesn't make any sense. They should have to put the sidewalk in there." But, always look to apply sound planning for community growth and community development. You know, what's best for your community? And I I I would say it's a great idea to bring in more people from the community, get their feedback, get their ideas, educate them, and this way you're going to have a you know, more cohesive community to do what's best for everybody. And consequences to the financial agreement for non-compliance. If they don't comply with the annual audit or any of the schedules that you want to get, uh it should be reviewed, too. I've been to a lot of municipalities they don't even review it, they just kind of throw it in the file cabinet. We got it, throw it in the file, and that's it. Makes sense to look at your review. You'd be surprised what you'd find in your review. Tax assessor and tax collector need to coordinate the control over the annual reporting of the pilot agreements. The timing of these audits can have a significant effect on the municipality's budget also, especially in mind in the cash cases. Basically, in New Jersey and we see a lot of places where these audits are delinquent, and they can greatly affect the stream of revenue coming in to the town. Yeah, cuz they're paying the current year based on a prior. Until they do the audit. So, wouldn't it be a good idea for that it be part of the the city's assessing and accounting to know it's part of their job to be on this is part of their job as an annual process? >> saying. That's all right. That's right. They take certain things that they have to file on. Yeah, with them. But I thought they uh They occurred. On the other account, have they occurred? These annual audits on the owner occupied? Well, these annuals what he's speaking of are the audits of the developers. They have their own audits. >> Specific to you. That they submit to the town. Right. But for the eight that we have existing, have they have they been occurring on annual basis? Those They come in, they come in, but they they have been delayed. What we've seen is that you're not collecting necessarily what you expect to in any given year because these audits have been delayed. So, you're not getting everything until the audit is filed. That's sometimes that can if they're delayed one year and they're delayed the next, maybe you're almost made whole because they were delayed. But, there are times when it can have an effect on the cash flow of the town. And again, in your town currently is it pretty It's not a significant revenue source at this point. You said seven or eight. What happens right right Yeah, no consequence. >> What happens right in the same If you already That's That's my loss. If if the reporting right in the same 2015 compliance Right. Now, if the audit is in compliance right in the same with with the initial agreement, if you're talking about you say annual audit, same way you know, they they come out and and and they evaluate my house every year. If I grow another 1 in of grass, they want to charge me more. But, again, right in the same what happens overall, if those persons that are responsible and it goes to the authority that they're not that they're not distinct, but they are just, you know, Yes, it's fiscal. >> No monetary penalty. Correct. We have Have we ever collected one single dime as a monetary penalty for these late years? And my answer is going to be probably not. Right. Except for Because we We have never seen a report. A report has never come before any of these people on that side. This is something that we have to do. So so so Yeah, so one of the one of the reports I think is is beneficial to look at each year is the comparison of what the PILOT revenue is that you're getting as to if it was fully assessed. Right. So, if they were paying full bore assessment like everybody else, what's that difference? You know, cuz in theory over time, it should come converge together. So, at the end they're fully compliant. What do you What would you use as your assessment though? I mean like I know it's you know standard value, fair value, market value. How do you assess a property like that? That's Typically the the tax assessor assesses the commercial properties based on revenue. And do we need commercial properties involved in it? It does every pilot require a commercial property No. involved so it could be all residential. Could be all residential, could be mixed use, could be all commercial. And the pilots don't necessarily all have to be 30 years. No. No, there's three ways of doing it. But all of them 30 years. All. I don't know if you know something about it. I don't know about anything. I knew about was 30 years. That's it. 30 years long time. Yeah, it must have been my last slide. Thank you. Question Question for you. Yes. And and thank you first of all. Yes. Yes. >> [applause] >> Let's say the volunteer and stuff like this is big. It's it's hard to get people willing to come out. Especially on a Saturday. We're starting this a little bit gang going on somewhere that you're that you're tied to. But anyway, um thank you. Um my my question is simple because there is a lot of information and trust me since the legal list values I always spoke um we've been kind of digging in just to make sure we understand every aspect of it. In your experience, how has the pilots been in your city and has the risk uh justified the rewards for you? Is it has it been a a good experience based on um you're going through and making sure all those things were done properly and has the pilot actually served your city well and development fund that has that surge result. So, where where I where I was the mayor and we only had that one and they're still under construction. So, they have So, the other ones that you Hey, the other ones where I I've actually worked with our business, our Newark and Jersey City, Woodbridge and a lot lot of them do real well. That's what I was going to say. A lot of what you just mentioned cities that have transformed in the last 10 years in the state. Yeah, Jersey City is like phenomenal the growth that they've had. So, they don't need more pilots. I understand what's that? Asbury Park has gone through a major transformation and it's the same thing with Newark. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. But what what I was meaning from what you were speaking of in relationship to Mr. Laws' question the thing that comes to my mind is with the pilot program are the key players in developing a pilot program for the municipality? Right. The professionals that have the skills with pilot programs. That's the key part and also with that you will build a great agreement for the municipality because developer has his lawyers Right. with the developer lawyers. Right. So, what we need are the key players Yes. that will help developers. Once it's developed then you need the municipality to have the individuals in place to watch over the pilot program annually. Right. So, that way you always follow the dollars and make sure everything is accounted for in the city. That's right. And and you know, we're talking about municipalities, Jersey City, Newark, even Asbury. These are all cities in North Jersey that their proximity to people coming and living in these areas and working either in those cities or in New York. Totally different from what's down here. And I have to say that probably Jersey City has had a resurgence in gentrification. Because if you're saying those apartments, those brownstones were expensive, you know darn well who's not living in those apartments in those brownstones. It's a whole different ballgame in the city of Pleasantville. First of all, we don't have high-paying jobs anywhere. As compared as to what is going on in North Jersey, okay? So, what were what the people are going to be here are going to reflect what our residents look like in the city of Pleasantville. The other thing is, if we bring in an influx of 200, 250 more people, what is the city are we building other businesses to bring people into the town to just spend money because of that? And that's what we have to look for for our pilot programs is what are they going to bring in to us as a city to make us without us having to expand any more energy or any any more funds to bring people in. So, just finish. What what city are you in, Summit? You were the mayor of Summit? Of Watchung in Summit. Watchung, okay. You guys have a water water front water way on Mary in Watchung? No, we have a lot of streams that flow into two lakes. Oh, nice. Nice. Okay. And the two lakes converge in this one heavy stream that flows down into Plainfield. Right. Right. So, we had a hurricane in it was when I was mayor. Uh-huh. So, we had a deluge of all that rain. The streams all went into the two lakes. The lakes overflowed. Where they converge, it's like a 40-ft soaking ravine. It was quarried out where the water typically flows. It came up above the 40-ft and into the roadway. The cars were boats. Wow. They were going down the roadway. So, our police officers had to save a lot of people. Can Can you Can you speak to something I think there may be a misunderstanding as well. Just listening to the audience, there may be a misunderstanding between the community benefits [clears throat] right over here on my left hand and on my right hand, the negotiation of the actual pilot. So, in the negotiation [clears throat] of the pilot and how that pilot functions is one thing, whether it's 15% or percent, you know, whatever, you know, we negotiate within the pilot. Those dollars get to be spent by the city at their discretion, right? But the community benefits, that's something totally different, right? And can can you speak to those community benefits as uh in negotiations of a a pilot program? Maybe you want to, you know, some support of the the local sports teams or you you dream of You can you can't negotiate that development. Right. To put it in. That's that's that's where I'm going. Yeah, you you can't do that. It's not going to hold up. You can't do that. Right. Okay. So, you want something specific for the for the track, you know. I mean, I was a big track guy in Woodbridge. So, that goes straight to them. I always loved indoor track, you know, but there's not many indoor tracks out there. It's on German. The information that we just received at the past League of Municipalities and it was the mayor the mayor of North Woodbridge. John McCormick. Who gave the presentation. But he also conjoined in writing the same school board and with everyone else that that one in that they could that they formed a group in terms of looking at the whole re- configuration of Woodbridge. I I was able to see personally some of it because one of the things that they highlighted was the high was the high school. The high school and the middle school. And I had physically saw it go up cuz I would go to work there every day. And I physically saw it demolish it, build it up. Looks like a college campus. Now, again, when we are talking about projects such as that, right? How can we turn around and get something a mindset of along that here in the city of Temple Hill. Because if I go and show you my my schools, you would think that that's the county jail. But it's I think the biggest part is the people communicating. So, I know John the former as well. He meets with his school superintendent every week. They meet weekly. So, it's not like your school board does their own thing. The town does their own thing, but if they don't collaborate and work together, So, he's the type person he wants to collaborate. And so, he had the entire school board connected. And so, it's the elected officials, he's the mayor, and the school board people, they're all together. This is what we're doing that's best for our community, and it's working. And so, when it's fractured and it's like the school board does their own thing and the town does their own thing and they're not talking to each other, it's not as good. It's It's better if you Yeah, I just answered that. And I think some people just assume that those relationships or partnerships aren't happening, but those relationships and partnerships, they do happen. The The conversations are there in our conference rooms and things like that. So, we It It does happen, but I just think here if certain people aren't at the table, they just believe that it's not happening. And they just believe that, you know, what we're elected to do, we're not doing our job because they don't see it. I I I go up to the school board I go up to the school board every other week. But every other week I'll give them I'm talking about conversation. a number of these things. >> Even even in my my town of Longshot where I was mayor, my administrator would meet with our school administrator every week. We did collaborative [clears throat] stuff and we did all the planning for all the school property. We and our town did the playgrounds and stuff together in the baseball more fields. Uh it it helps because you can save a lot of money if you work together like that. From what I was reading a while back again under the power program um Governor Murphy stated in reference to uh a certain location that might be a real valuable location in your town that wasn't one of the sites under a place of needing development that Governor Murphy was stating when they started this power program was a site to get a power program. Can you help me out with that one? It it's it's supposed to be an area in need of redevelopment which like in that first slide I had is a blighted area where you it's not conducive to live or work. So I'll give you a different example. I I got a call from Chatham. Chatham is a very upscale community that has a train line that goes right into New York City. It's uh It's Morris Morris County I think Chatham. It's Morris County. I go up to the mayor. He's like, "Oh yeah, the developer wants a pilot agreement to redevelop this property next to our train station." That's the most valuable property in your town. It doesn't need any pilot agreement. It doesn't need any incentive. I'll get you 20 other developers that will develop right there. But the city of Pleasantville went ahead years ago in their master plan and and deemed the entire city in need of redevelopment. So even our most valuable waterfront property is deemed in need of redevelopment. That's how it happened. Every every inch of the city is deemed in Well, only the park has been 25 to 30 years since they they've initiated some type of movement over there and has not happened. So, other than our park, what what That doesn't mean it I'm just saying other than our park over there, what else has happened? So, if you if you want to look at it, we we have to understand that if something's sitting there and almost blighted, that's what that school's been talking about. What what We understand it's that approximately to the water. But, all of West New York City it's approximately to the water. You're going to tell me that that Yeah, it's valuable, but what does it look like? I would like to I would like you to finish what you were speaking of. What was the ending on that? As far as that town wanted the pilot program, so did they get it or they didn't get They didn't They didn't meet the criteria. So, so the criteria is what we're speaking of here. Uh we we have a a site that's one of the most valuable sites and it is waterfront. And like the as Laura said, it's been sitting for 25 years. So, that necessarily says that it's in need of redevelopment to fit the category of area that needs redevelopment because nobody has developed the property. I just believe what you got, man. That's It's it's it's it's open to your opinion. Like I said, like buying the 44 acres over there and But, you have to designate it for the area in order to move forward and find a developer. So, like they said, the whole city's being redeveloped. Is it is is it meets the criteria? It's open for But, whether whether But, whether it's designated as an element of area in need of redevelopment or not, it's still what happens is dependent on the agreements you make. True. No matter how it's designated, what happens is dependent on the agreements you make. between the developer and the city. Hold on. Before you talk to the developer, before it gets to Right, right, right. >> Well, that's the regardless of that point I'm saying it's still Yeah, it will happen if it's in the language of the actual agreements. Right. You get me? Yeah. Thank you. All right. Thank you everybody. All right. Thank you very much, sir. Have a great weekend. [applause] There's coffee [cheering] and donuts in the back for anyone who wants some. >> [music] [music]